In March 2025, the U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy invited public input for developing an “Artificial Intelligence Action Plan” under President Trump. Key themes from thousands of responses highlight export controls, infrastructure investment, regulatory frameworks, ethical AI, and intellectual property. These insights aim to reinforce U.S. leadership in the evolving AI landscape.
In March 2025, the U.S. Office of Science and Technology Policy invited the public’s input to aid President Trump’s administration in developing an “Artificial Intelligence Action Plan.” This initiative aims to fortify U.S. leadership in AI, emerging from thousands of responses spotlighting five pivotal themes: export controls, infrastructure investment, regulatory frameworks, ethical AI development, and intellectual property management. These insights will guide the crafting of the action plan, setting a future direction for AI policy distinct from previous administrations.
President Trump’s Executive Order on AI underscores an ambitious effort to maintain American dominance in the sector. The Office of Science and Technology Policy engaged various stakeholders to gather critical feedback, revealing universal concerns around export controls, investment in infrastructure, and the ethical implications of AI development. Contrasting Biden’s approach, which emphasized ethical guidelines and state-level measures, Trump’s administration seeks a flexible policy framework, leveraging market dynamics and fostering innovation to secure U.S. AI leadership.
Most contributors emphasized targeted export controls aimed at preserving the international competitiveness of U.S. AI. OpenAI’s proposition of an “exporting democratic AI” framework emphasizes promoting allied countries’ AI capabilities while restricting access for adversarial nations like China. This push for controlled access recognizes the necessity of ensuring U.S. technological security while fostering competitive advantage through strategic export policies.
The need for substantial investment in AI infrastructure became a recurring sentiment among commenters, with organizations like Google and OpenAI advocating for large-scale funding. They stressed the importance of energy reforms and enhanced computational power to stay competitive against global rivals. Investing in robust data systems is also vital, allowing for effective AI applications and increased operational efficiency crucial for public sector agencies.
Regulatory clarity emerged as a key theme, with organizations urging for regulations that balance innovation with risk management. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce and Business Roundtable called for a harmonized national framework to prevent conflicts from state-by-state laws. Supporting a cohesive regulatory environment would allow businesses to innovate efficiently without getting bogged down by compliance hurdles.
A broader ethical dialogue emerged around AI’s development, focusing on safety and security. Contributors like the Center for Security and Emerging Technology stressed the importance of risk assessment and regulatory oversight. Ensuring ethical standards in AI deployment requires rigorous testing and accountability, particularly for applications influencing privacy and safety.
Intellectual property concerns highlight the need for access to data for AI training. Companies want fair use exceptions to enhance AI learning capabilities. Google advocates for strong copyright protections to avoid prolonged negotiations for data access, while content creators emphasize proper licensing to balance innovation and rights preservation. Improving the patent system is also essential to facilitate timely reviews and address potential legal bottlenecks.
The feedback gathered from this initiative is set to shape an AI Action Plan by the Trump Administration, focusing on export controls, infrastructure, regulations, ethics, and intellectual property. With a decisive approach motivated by the desire to cement U.S. leadership in AI, the administration aims to harmonize innovation with safety and competitive integrity. If executed effectively, this plan could secure the United States’ position at the forefront of the AI landscape.
Original Source: www.americanactionforum.org
